Democratizing ASEAN and the Role of the European Union

In 2008 the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) adopted the quasi-constitutional ASEAN Charter which many observers regarded as a landmark document in the grouping’s institutional evolution. With the Charter Southeast Asian governments seek to transform ASEAN from a regional organization based on “soft law” (that is, informal and non-binding processes of decision-making) with a poor implementation record into a rule-based, more legalized and, hence, more effective regional grouping. No less ambitious was the objective to convert ASEAN from an elitist, state-centric organization to a people-oriented association.

This workshop targets the latter of these objectives. While research has so far primarily concentrated on the question as to what extent regional organizations facilitate the democratization of member countries, much less attention has been devoted to the democratization of regional governance itself. This is surprising as complaints about the democratic deficit of regional organizations abound and pressures to democratize arcane international decision-making bodies markedly increased. Especially ASEAN, Asia’s leading and most established regional organization has often been taken to task as an overly elitist and state-centric organization. The question is thus as to what extent the Charter has facilitated a more participatory and people-centered process of regional decision-making.

After a general overview of post-Asian crisis reforms of Southeast Asian regionalism, the workshop first seeks to assess whether there are specific ideational roots that have entrenched executive dominance and the often deplored secretive decision-making processes in ASEAN. If a strong “cognitive prior” (Acharya) providing legitimacy to ASEAN’s executive dominance can be identified, internal as well as external drivers for participatory reforms will face serious obstacles. A second step thus must concentrate on potential drivers of change, their societal backing, their regional policy agendas and their strategies to effect change. Such drivers could be regional civil society networks, academic think tanks and legislators. However, in an increasingly dense web of interregional relations such drivers could also be external norm entrepreneurs. Pivotal in this respect is the European Union which cultivates such a role and which therefore has been labeled a “normative power” or even a “transformative power.” Therefore, the third part of the roundtable studies the role of the European Union as an external democratizer of regional governance. It explores as to what extent EU human rights and democracy promotion policies have influenced ASEAN reform dialogues and led to tangible change in the regional grouping’s decision-making patterns.